These days this is a hot topic of discussion.
There seems to be only two sides to this story, one side is crying ‘5th
amendment’ and the other side is crying ‘who cares’, but I believe there are
two sides to the solution to this issue. It’s easy to complain about an issue
or ignore it, but it’s a lot harder to solve it! Let me explain my position…
I will address the ‘who cares’ crowd first,
as this will be short and sweet. To those of you who don’t care what the NSA
does is a fine position to take, but it actually does fly in the face of the 5th
amendment and actually does violate Americans personal freedoms in a way that
the founding fathers never intended, regardless of the passing of the USA
Patriot Act. Just to be clear, just because Congress passed these laws, the
President signed them and the SCOTUS hasn’t really weighed in on this issue,
doesn’t mean that it’s unconstitutional. This fact is undeniable, so even
though you feel it’s OK for the NSA to collect this data, it’s still
anti-Constitutional. Period.
However, before those on the other side start
cheering, you must understand, most serious people that believe this way, are
also very careful with their personal information and protect themselves from
the tactics of the NSA.
See, short and sweet.
Now to get to the meat of the issue, the
people spouting the ‘5th amendment’ argument. Obviously, in the deep
meaning of the Constitution, I understand and believe in this concept, but I
take issue with people who ‘cry wolf’ and leave a slaughtered lamb on their
doorstep. Again, let me explain…
Anyone that is spouting off this kind of
rhetoric and are not being personally responsible for their own data security,
needs to take a step back and look inwards before casting the stone. Even
though you are holding the high ground with your Constitutional argument, if
you aren’t taking responsibility to guard your own personal data, you are part
of the problem. See, you might think the internet should be free of any kind of
personal challenge, you must understand that the internet is the jungle and you’re
either a lion or a lamb. So a lamb claiming that the lion is unfair, is just
not right. Soul search those words.
Again, short and sweet.
But, to the point, this is a serious issue
and it deserves more thought than just considering your own opinion, whether it
be based on the Constitution or just the fact that you don’t care. There needs
to be a dialogue on this among We the People, and not left up to the
politicians and DC.
Ok, your turn…
Hrmm. I hope people aren't just sticking to the 5th - a fairly clear case can be made that this is violating the 4th, 5th, perhaps the 9th and 10th in a fashion. Some people would go so far as the 1st when it comes to encrypted comms being suspect by default.
ReplyDeleteOtherwise sounds good to me, -Pk
No, I don't think it's just the 5th, but I just used that one because it's the one most heard. The other amendments you listed are of course in the mix of the story, just trying to keep it brief and to the point.
DeleteThanks for the read and your insightful comments! They are much appreciated and add another level to the story.
-MJ